landscapers finale

Landscapers Finale Season 1 Episode 4 Recap

The show begins with an empty cell. Christopher Edwards (David Thewlis) is talking to his stepmother, Tabitha Edwards (Katheryn) while the camera shows various scenes. He asks her to not disclose a secret he is about to tell her. Chris and his wife, Susan Edwards (Olivia Colman) are passengers in a vehicle. Susan takes a seat immediately upon entering the movie set. The call between Chris and Tabitha continues. Susan has a flashback of her childhood. Young Susan (Connie Kiss Mee) is standing in a field with a white horse.

landscapers finale

Susan is in a police paddy wagon surrounded by media. She arrives at her location. In the background, Susan is writing a letter to Chris. She tells him, being shut off from the real world never bothered her because she was prohibited from arriving there in the first place. She joins Chris in the defendant box. He does not acknowledge her presence.

landscapers finale s01e04 recap

In a flashback, Susan and Chris are dressed in Western garb. They struggle to remove the bodies from inside the house to a truck waiting outside. When she gets into the truck, Chris says, “I’ll be back before you know it, just hold tight.” She turns around to see him standing by a tree. A few seconds later, you can hear him urinating.

landscapers season 1 episode 4 finale

Tabitha hears a rapping on her front door. She gets up to look and discovers a letter attached to the doorframe with a knife. She removes the knife and begins to read the letter.

Chris and Susan are in the defendant box at court. The prosecutor is going over the case with the jury. She calls the defendants “cold-blooded killers.” Susan is feeding the horses while Chris sits quietly, staring out at the landscape. He drinks from a canteen she brought him without acknowledging her.

landscapers susan finale recap

Tabitha has arrived in town. She finds DC Emma Lancing, (Kate O’Flynn), DC Paul Wilkie (Samuel Anderson), and DCI Collier (Daniel Rigby) sitting on a porch. She gives an account of how the letter was found on her porch, where Chris left it. She hands the letter to Wilkie who gives it to Lancing.

landscapers finale episode 4 recap

The truck with the corpses travels down a dirt road. Expert witness, Dr. Dickson (John Mackay) explains decomposition to the jury. Decomposition begins almost immediately upon death. The decomposition phase, putrefaction (bloat) begins three or four days later in a warm environment. In the defendant box, Susan looks over at Chris. Dickson continues to talk about the decomposition process. Swelling and foul-smelling gases are contributed to microorganisms eating body tissue. In this phase of decomposition, the foul-smelling gases can induce nausea and vomiting. Susan covers her nose with a cloth while they continue to their destination. The prosecutor asks the expert witness if Chris and Susan could avoid the decomposition gases. He says no.

landscapers finale season 1 episode 4

On horseback, the detectives are searching for Chris and Susan. Susan’s solicitor, Douglas Hylton (Dipo Ola) watches them through a spyglass. The prosecutor questions a witness about rigor mortis, which dissipates without refrigeration about three days after death. The defendants claim the victims’ bodies were in rigor mortis when they were buried six days after death. The expert witness says it is highly improbable, suggesting their timescale must be mistaken.

landscapers finale episode 4 christopher

Chris and Susan gag when the bodies are removed from the bed of the truck. The detectives discover their previous campsite. A witness demonstrates the trigger action of a double-action revolver. The trigger action occurs in two phases. Pulling the trigger requires a bit of effort. It is unlikely, the trigger could be accidentally pulled. Chris is standing by a pile of burning brush. The bodies of Patricia Wycherley (Felicity Montagu) and William Wycherley (David Hayman) are laying on top of the fire.

landscapers finale season 1 episode 4 recap

Chris is sworn in. He tells the jury about the American actor, Gary Cooper.  The prosecutor says they loved Western movies, with gunslingers and outlaws. Chris corrects her, saying Susan loved Western films. He views them as being “harmless”. A 2700-pound invoice for a Gary Cooper letter is presented to the jury. The prosecutor describes the defendants’ financial state as “on the verge of bankruptcy.” Chris designs the allegations. He smirks when asked about his correspondence with actor Gerard Depardieu. When he tries to explain his relationship with Hollywood actors, he is cut off by the prosecutor. He says, “Well, now you’re interrupting my answer” and shakes his head in disbelief. He tells the jury about a revolver he previously owned. The revolver was compatible with .38-caliber cartridges.

landscapers finale episode 4

He did not possess the gun or cartridges in May 1998. He acknowledges that Susan was afraid of guns. He describes her mental state as “fragile.” He admits to being interested in the military history of guns. He sold his guns and surrendered his firearms certificate when Susan moved in with him in September 1995. Susan did not like for him to be away from her. He enjoyed the hobby and feels it was a mutual choice to give it up. It was mutual to bury Patricia’s and William’s bodies. The prosecutor continues to grill him about his relationship with Susan. He married Susan because he loved her. He has been living her life with her since their wedding. Susan unhappily watches from the defendant box.

landscapers finale episode 4 recap

At the campsite, Susan is awakened by a twig snapping. Chris demonstrates precision target shooting. The detectives gradually approach their campsite. When Chris demonstrates how to pull the trigger of a revolver, a gunshot causes the member of the jury, prosecutor, and other attendees to scream and scatter. Susan watches in horror. The detectives raid their campsite. Chris fires his weapon, hitting members of the posse. She refuses to leave with him. She questions how the detectives knew their location. She knows Chris told Tabitha about her parents. She angrily grabs the gun, walking in the direction of the detectives, she fires it. Chris flees the campsite when he sees Susan is hit in the upper left arm.

landscapers finale episode 4

Susan has a flashback of her childhood from her cell. She is in the witness box. She gives the jury a recount of what happened the night her parents died. Patricia insults Susan before she is shot. The casings and the gun are disposed of in a trash can in the middle of the street. Hylton becomes anxious because does nothing to stop Susan from speaking. She picked up 20 bottles of air refreshers after opening a bank account. The prosecutor asks her to acknowledge if she knew the revolver utilized to shoot her parents did not discharge casings. She responds, “No.” She wrapped her parents’ bodies in duvet covers to avoid seeing them. She breaks down on the stand but continues to deny being “fragile.”  She is broken and can no longer be hurt by anyone.

landscapers series 1 episode 4 finale

At the campsite, Susan begins to scream for Chris. She grabs her injured held and attempts to stand. She fires her weapon multiple times before her attorney shoots it out of her hand. She turns around shocked. Hylton watches passersby from a park bench.

At the prison, Susan discloses more information to Hylton about the Gerard Depardieu correspondence with Chris. She learned how to replicate his handwriting. She continued to write letters to Chris from Gerard Depardieu. After Chris began to question why all the letters had London postage marks, she purchased a franking machine. Hylton says her story is “sweet.” He says she helped him appreciate his life, calling himself “lucky.” They shake hands. She has a flashback of a white horse in the field.

landscapers finale season 1 episode 4

Susan and Chris stand in the defendant box as Judge Blacklock (Souad Faress) speaks. She believes they acted together.

Lancing and Wilkie are discussing the case at the British Waterways. She tells Wilkie about a time when she threatened her dad for abusing her mother. Wilkie asks what happened. She says he left. Lancing stops Wilkie when he tries to hug her. She refuses his offer to go out for a drink sometime. She would, in theory, but not in practice in about 10 years before her eggs dry up. She calls him a “sensitive lad” as they walk away.

landscapers finale recap

Susan receives a letter from Chris. She reads the letter as a scene of Susan at the campsite appears on the screen. The detectives stand as she walks away from the campsite. Chris removes and tosses his hat, wig, bandanna, and gun belt in the brush. He puts on his glasses and continues to walk down a dirt road. A bright light appears with Chris. They are on a movie set. They hop on a white horse and ride away into the distance as the episode comes to an end.

 

Landscapers Review

There is only one word to describe the finale “rubbish.” The combination of dark comedy and drama was not a good choice for the Chris and Susan murder case. Ed Sinclair and Will Sharpe made light of a tragic event that left two people dead and two others in prison for at least 25 years. There is little evidence to support the chain of events portrayed in the show. Other than a vague Wikipedia page, the evidence is little to none. So, viewers will only have to guess what led up to and how the Wycherley’s murders played out. Hopefully, the acting crew, especially David Thewlis and Olivia Colman will be more selective in their future roles. The episode deserves a 5.5.

Get more Landscapers recaps here.

Share with your buddies!
  1. Marta Kramer says:

    Agree with your assessment. I turned the episode off after 30 minutes of nothing that made any sense.

    • ReelMockery says:

      Not sure what they were going for here, but it wasn’t tradition story telling. Was expecting a whole lot more from this so the disappointment was much worse. Thanks for stopping by and commenting.

      • Guest says:

        ReelMockery You just replied in your own comment what they went for. Non-traditional storytelling. It’s obvious that it wasn’t a murder mystery, it was more of a psychology drama, a character study combined with elements of surrealism. I also don’t think they ”made light of” of the real-life tragedy. I don’t know how you could have seen it, all the comic moments were NOT concerning the murder/trial. The murder itself (and the couple’s life) was portrayed as tragedy. Especially in the last two episodes. Now, you said that ”there is little evidence to support the chain of events portrayed in the show…” – well, isn’t it true to a certain extent to ALL films/shows based on real-life events? Especially crimes. We can never know what exactly happened (even if there were more evidence/facts), we never know what exactly the perpetrator was thinking… So essentially, all drama-crime movies are just speculations on what might have happened. Even though the show was compassionate towards the Edwards, they also showed the possibility that they might have been liars afterall. So, it doesn’t glorify murder/crime in any way (unlike many other movies do). It shows a tragedy of abuse, fraught family relationships, manipulation, isolation, wrong choices… All those film scenes were shown to make us understand that they essentially escaped into their own reality, isn’t that tragic as well? No facts were ”made up” by this show – there is evidence about Susan’s family history, about the couple shady finances, their testimony and evidence against them… The only ”guesses” were made in regards to Edwards’ personalities – which again is always the case in shows like that. The writers did not insist they were right in their speculations.
        I understand that you didn’t like the show but that last phrase (that actors and the crew should be more ”careful in their future choices”) was arrogant and dismissive. Maybe they can make their own minds in regards to their OWN careers)))

  2. David says:

    Gosh. I’m sorry I read this. I thought the episode, though it could have come off as just dark comedy, instead was handled tenderly and brilliantly.

    • ReelMockery says:

      No reason to be sorry at all. Everyone is different so there are going to be many unique opinions out there. It seems Landscapers was a show people either hated or loved. I wanted to be in the latter category, but it unfortunately didn’t do it for me.

      Maybe we’ll agree on the next one? Thanks for stopping by. Be sure to come again.

    • Guest says:

      Completely agree, David!

  3. Andreea says:

    This is a beautiful film. The ending was truly sweet and it leaves you meditate on several things. I agree with David.

    • ReelMockery says:

      Glad you enjoyed it. Wasn’t for me. Seems it was one of those shows you either loved or hated. Unfortunately, I was in the latter category. Thanks for stopping by!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *